Fruin-Colnon Corp. v. Vogt
District Court, S.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
FOREMAN, Chief Judge:
This case presents before the Court a narrow issue of law: whether activity on a navigable waterway by construction barges building a bridge paid for almost entirely by federal money yet contracted by the State, can constitute a trespass on an adjacent owner’s riparian rights in the riverbed and shore.
Plaintiffs’ complaint sought declaratory, injunctive and damage relief in the following requests: (1) a declaration that plaintiffs’ past and intended uses of the Mississippi and connecting navigable waters are authorized by law; (2) an injunction forbidding defendants…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Kaiser Aetna v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Shively v. BowlbySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- United States v. Chandler-Dunbar Water Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Gilman v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
- Scranton v. WheelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kal-O-Mine Industries, Inc. v. Camp (In Re Lumpkin Sand & Gravel, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Georgia · 1989
- Fruin Colnon Corp. v. VogtDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 1982