Legal Opinion

Wagner v. Shaw

District Court, D. Alaska

Decided July 12, 1922No. 2343PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RITCHIE, District Judge.

In this case I am inclined to change my ruling, not because I have changed my opinion as to the probable meaning of the statute involved, but because I have failed to give sufficient weight to another principle which I think is entitled to prevail, and that is, that when a statute is susceptible of two constructions, and one construction more nearly accords with equity than the other, it should be adopted. In this case I think all the equity is in favor of the construction contended for by counsel for the mortgagee, although I am still of the belief that the view I…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Church of the Holy Trinity v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. United States v. ChaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  3. Bear Lake & River Water Works & Irrigation Co. v. GarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  4. Wimberly v. Mayberry & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1891
  5. Cooper Manufacturing Co. v. DelahuntOregon Supreme Court · 1900

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Drake Lumber Co. v. Paget Mortgage Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Lynch v. McCannAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Bratzel v. StaffordOregon Supreme Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API