Wagner v. Shaw
District Court, D. Alaska
1Opinion of the Court
RITCHIE, District Judge.
In this case I am inclined to change my ruling, not because I have changed my opinion as to the probable meaning of the statute involved, but because I have failed to give sufficient weight to another principle which I think is entitled to prevail, and that is, that when a statute is susceptible of two constructions, and one construction more nearly accords with equity than the other, it should be adopted. In this case I think all the equity is in favor of the construction contended for by counsel for the mortgagee, although I am still of the belief that the view I…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Church of the Holy Trinity v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- United States v. ChaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Bear Lake & River Water Works & Irrigation Co. v. GarlandSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Wimberly v. Mayberry & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1891
- Cooper Manufacturing Co. v. DelahuntOregon Supreme Court · 1900
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Drake Lumber Co. v. Paget Mortgage Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1954
- Lynch v. McCannAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
- Bratzel v. StaffordOregon Supreme Court · 1932