Legal Opinion

Banks v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 27, 1926No. 9803Published

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

MORROW, Judge.

— From Bill of Exceptions No. 1 it is made to appear that while the witness, Charlie Johnson, was testifying, the District Attorney elicited from him the admission-that he had plead guilty to a felony and had been given a suspended sentence. The bill does not explain the setting or the surrounding circumstances, and we are unable to determine the relation of the case to the testimony in question.. To require consideration, it is essential that the bill of exceptions be self-explanatory to a degree that will enable the court to determine from the bill…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Conger v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1911
  2. Jetty v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
  3. Soderman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
  4. Ard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925
  5. Reese v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API