Legal Opinion
Small v. Guste
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided May 29, 1979No. 12542PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
LANDRY, Judge.
This is a mandamus proceeding in which plaintiff (Appellee) seeks to compel defendants, William J. Guste, Jr., Attorney General of the State of Louisiana and Harry Conniek, District Attorney of the Parish of Orleans (Appellants), to file suit pursuant to LSA-R.S. 42:76, et seq. (the Intrusion Into Office Act) to test the right of the Honorable S. Sanford Levy, Judge, Division D of the Civil District Court, Parish of Orleans, to retain said office to which he was duly elected, beyond the allegedly mandatory retirement age of seventy-five years. Also made defendant was the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Acme Refrig. of Baton Rouge, Inc. v. Caljoan, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1977
- Segura v. Louisiana Architects Selection Bd.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
- State ex rel. Smith v. TheusSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1905
- Cook v. City of ShreveportSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
- State v. BaynardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1943
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Small v. GusteSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1979