Nine Twenty, LLC v. Bank of the Ozarks
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
McFadden, Judge.
This appeal concerns the liability of Donald and Evelyn Ray on their guaranties of certain notes. The Rays argue that the action is barred because the lender failed to seek confirmation of the foreclosure sales of the property securing the notes. But when they executed those guaranties, the Rays waived this condition precedent. The Rays also argue that the amount of the judgment against them is incorrect. We disagree. We therefore affirm the trial court’s grant of summary judgment to the appellee, Bank of the Ozarks. We deny Bank of the Ozarks’ motion to dismiss the appeal as…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- HWA Properties, Inc. v. Community & Southern BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
- PNC Bank, National Ass'n v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 2016
- Community & Southern Bank v. Dcb Investments, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
- Martin v. Hamilton State BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
- Ciuperca v. RES-GA Seven, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
3Cited by3 opinions
- Vance v. FD 2011-C1 Grove Road Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
- Ambrose v. Advantage Funding Commercial Capital Corp. (In re Ambrose)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2017
- Gene R. Vance v. Fd 2011-C1 Grove Road Limited PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016