Legal Opinion

Pape v. Huey's Collision Center

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 23, 2008No. ED 91433Published

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

2Per curiam

Appellant Dennis Pape (“Pape”), appeals from the judgment of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (“Commission”) after the Commission affirmed the Administrative Law Judge’s judgment denying Pape compensation for his work-related accident.

Pape brings one point on appeal, claiming the Commission erred in finding that Pape’s injury did not arise out of or occur in the course of his employment.

Huey’s filed a motion to dismiss Pape’s brief for failure to comply with Rule 84.04, in that the brief fails to state the legal reasons for the Commission’s error, and fails to explain why…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Livingston v. Schnuck Markets, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. MEGARGEL WILLBRAND & COMPANY, LLC v. FAMPAT Ltd. PartnershipMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API