Legal Opinion
Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Federal Energy Administration
District Court, N.D. California
Decided July 19, 1976No. C-76-591 RFPPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
PECKHAM, Chief Judge.
This action concerns the validity of two determinations by the Federal Energy Administration (hereafter “FEA”) that certain Atlantic Richfield Company (hereafter “ARCO”) Commission Distributors and Commission Tank Truck Distributors are “wholesale purchaser-resellers” within the meaning of 10 C.F.R. 211.51. Plaintiff ARCO seeks a preliminary injunction that would set aside these determinations. It claims that they are invalid because (1) they were made without affording ARCO the necessary protections of due process to which it was entitled under the…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Meachum v. FanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Roberts v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 1988
- Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Federal Energy AdministrationTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1977
- Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Department of EnergyTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1981
- Spinetti v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1976
- MGPC, INC. v. DuncanDistrict Court, D. Wyoming · 1984
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.