Legal Opinion

Hamilton Rubber Mfg. Co. v. Stewart

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 1, 1931No. 5986Published

1Opinion of the Court

DAWKINS, District Judge.

Plaintiffs, alleging themselves to be judgment creditors of the United Tire Stores, Inc., with return nulla bona of executions thereon, brought this suit to recover of the defendants Elmo C. Tenison, Maco Stewart, Sr., and Maco Stewart, Jr., alleged unpaid subscriptions to the capital stock of said company. Plaintiffs further charged that' the corporation had been dissolved and its charter forfeited for failure to pay the franchise tax exacted by the state of Texas. Each of the defendants denied any liability for the»stock; Tenison averring that his stock had been paid…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Handley v. StutzSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. First National Bank v. Gustin Minerva Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
  3. Schrader v. Manufacturers' Nat. Bank of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. Mathis v. Pridham, ReceiverCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1892
  5. Cole v. Adams, ReceiverCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1898

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API