Legal Opinion

Barlow v. Evans

District Court, D. Utah

Decided June 16, 1997No. 96-CV-0953BPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER

BENSON, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Henry, Mark, and Hyrum Barlow initiated this action against defendants Neal and Barbara Evans for their refusal to perform an agreement to sell real property located in Lehi, Utah. The Barlows claim that because the Evans’ refusal was based upon the belief, mistaken or otherwise, that the Barlows were polygamists, it is in violation of the Federal Fair Housing Act (“FHA”), 42 U.S.C. § 3604(a), which forbids a refusal to sell real estate “because ... of religion.” The Barlows also assert various state causes of action, but their…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Brad Bangerter v. Orem City Corporation, a Utah Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  3. Mountain Side Mobile Estates Partnership v. Secretary Of Housing And Urban DevelopmentCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  4. Potter v. Murray CityCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
  5. Peabody Properties, Inc. v. ShermanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Elisha D. Hack v. The President And Fellows Of Yale CollegeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
  2. Brown v. BuhmanDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2013
  3. Hack v. President & Fellows of Yale CollegeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API