State v. Blaisdell
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Indictment for violation of the provisions of R. S., Chap. 130, Sec. 1, as amended by Chap. 126, Public Laws, 1917. After verdict of •guilty, respondent filed certain exceptions to the rulings of presiding Justicé. Judgment in accordance with opinion. Case state in opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtPhilbrook, J.
This case comes before us upon exceptions, several in number. After the testimony for the State was submitted in 'the trial court the respondent moved that the presiding Justice direct a verdict in her favor on the ground that the State’s evidence was insufficient in law to 'warrant a conviction. This motion having been denied an exception was allowed. This exception involves interpretation of the statute under which the indictment was drawn and our conclusions upon this exception render examination of the other exceptions unnecessary.
The indictment charges that the respondent, on the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. MitchellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1900
3Cited by12 opinions
- Smith v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1950
- State v. HealdSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
- State v. BellinoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
- Depositors Trust Company of Augusta v. JohnsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1966
- Middleton's CaseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1939
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.