Legal Opinion
Eszlinger v. Wetzel
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided November 18, 1982No. Civ. 10142Published
1Opinion of the Court
326 N.W.2d 215 (1982)
Sam S. ESZLINGER and Esther M. Eszlinger, individually and as husband and wife, Plaintiffs and Appellants,
v.
Walwin WETZEL and Christine Wetzel, husband and wife, Defendants and Appellees.
Civ. No. 10142.
Supreme Court of North Dakota.
November 18, 1982.
Russell J. Jensen, St. Paul, Minn., and Vogel, Brantner, Kelly, Knutson, Weir & Bye, Fargo, for plaintiffs and appellants; argued by Russell J. Jensen, St. Paul, Minn.
Wheeler, Wolf, Peterson, Schmitz, McDonald & Johnson, Bismarck, for defendants and appellees; argued by Albert A. Wolf, Bismarck.
PEDERSON, Justice.
This is an…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Commissioner v. DubersteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Waletzko v. HerdegenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
- Hoge v. HogeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
- Ellendale Farmers Union Cooperative Ass'n v. DavisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
- Matton Oil Transfer Corporation v. DynamicCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.