Legal Opinion

Haynie v. May

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 6, 1934No. 41888PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDonecan, J.

This case involves conflicting claims of ownership as to certain accretion lands along the east side of the Missouri river in Mills county, Iowa. It appears that for several years prior to 1895 the Missouri river, in the vicinity of the land here involved, had gradually eroded its banks to the eastward. About that time it began to recede to the westward. The east bank at the time the river reached its most easterly channel was surveyed and was indicated by a line referred to herein as the “Dean Line.” Section 13 lies to the north of section 24, and section 19 lies to the east of section 24.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Jefferis v. East Omaha Land Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Payne v. HallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
  3. Crill v. HudsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1903
  4. Wood v. McAlpineSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  5. Mobbs v. BurrowSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Smith v. WhitneyMontana Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Mulhall v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Deering Ex Rel. Volts v. GahmSupreme Court of Iowa · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API