Legal Opinion

Birmingham Southern R. Co. v. Kendrick

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 28, 1946No. 6 Div. 398PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STAKELY, Justice.

This is a suit under the Homicide Act. § 123, Tit. 7, Code 1940. The case was submitted to the jury on two counts both charging subsequent negligence. Trial of the case resulted in a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff. Error is predicated on refusal of a number of written charges, including the affirmative charge, requested by appellant, and the action of the court in overruling motion for a new trial.

On December 5, 1943, at about 5:30 P. M. Central War Time in broad daylight, the body of Carl L. Kendrick was discovered by a train crew of appellant, lying between the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Alabama Great Southern Railroad v. McWhorterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
  2. Southern Railway Co. v. DrakeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1910
  3. Alabama Great Southern R. Co. v. SandersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
  4. Beavers v. Southern Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  5. Callaway v. GriffinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company v. JohnsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  2. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. FrenchSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
  3. Kendrick v. BIRMINGHNA SOUTHERN R. CO.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1950
  4. Earnest v. Regent Pool, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1972
  5. Southern Railway Co. v. HughesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API