Legal Opinion

Clements v. 3M Electronic Monitoring

District Court, M.D. Florida

Decided June 15, 2021No. 2:16-cv-00776Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA FORT MYERS DIVISION LOUIS MATTHEW CLEMENTS, Plaintiff, v. Case No: 2:16-cv-776-SPC-NPM 3M ELECTRONIC MONITORING, INC. n/k/a ATTENTI US, INC. Defendant. / OPINION AND ORDER1 Before the Court are Plaintiff Louis Clements’ Rule 60(b)(4) Motion (Doc. 81) and Motion to Disqualify Counsel (Doc. 82). Defendant 3M Electronic Monitoring, Inc., now known as Attenti US, Inc. (“3M EM”) responded in opposition (Docs. 83; 84). The Motions are denied. BACKGROUND Clements has a long and storied history before this Court. His Second Amended Complaint was…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Gonzalez v. ThalerSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  2. FW/PBS, Inc. v. City of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Grupo Dataflux v. Atlas Global Group, L. P.Supreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. EspinosaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  5. Harris v. GarnerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API