Legal Opinion

Midvale City Corp. v. Haltom

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 2003No. 20010794Published

1Opinion of the Court

73 P.3d 334 (2003)

2003 UT 26

MIDVALE CITY CORPORATION, Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

John HALTOM, an individual, and Doctor John's, Inc., dba Doctor John's Lingerie and Novelty Boutique, Defendants and Appellants.

No. 20010794.

Supreme Court of Utah.

May 16, 2003.

Rehearing Denied July 2, 2003.

Peter Stirba, Corbin B. Gordon, Benson L. Hathaway, Salt Lake City, for plaintiff.

John Fahle, San Antonio, Texas, and W. Andrew McCullough, Midvale, for defendants.

JACKSON, Judge:

¶ 1 Defendants John Haltom and Doctor John's, Inc. (Dr. John's) appeal the trial court's issuance of a permanent injunction prohibiting…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent.

2Cases cited58 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Perry Education Ass'n v. Perry Local Educators' Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API