Legal Opinion
People v. Cancel
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 21, 2012PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The defendant’s contention that his plea was not knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently entered is unpreserved for appellate review (see People v Shaffer, 81 AD3d 989 [2011]; People v Budden, 77 AD3d 672 [2010]). In any event, the record demonstrates that the defendant’s plea was entered knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently (see People v Fiumefreddo, 82 NY2d 536, 543 [1993]; People v Lopez, 71 NY2d 662, 666 [1988]).
The defendant’s contention that he was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel is based on matter dehors the record, and therefore cannot be reviewed on direct…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. LopezNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- People v. FiumefreddoNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- People v. ShafferAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- People v. BuddenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- People v. BrewerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. ApplingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. FrancoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. CohenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. FrancoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013