Marriage of Harlan v. Harlan
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
BUCHANAN, Judge.
CASE SUMMARY
Respondent-appellant Joyce Harlan (Joyce) appeals from the trial court's divi*554sion of property in the dissolution of her marriage to Hal Harlan (Hal), claiming the trial court abused its discretion when it deducted from the marital estate the possible tax liability which would be incurred if Hal sold one of his businesses, and when it valued the marital residence. Hal cross-appeals, claiming the trial court incorrectly interpreted the parties' ante-nuptial agreement.
We reverse in part and affirm in part.
FACTS
The facts most favorable to the judgment reveal that the…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Burkhart v. BurkhartIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
- Viccaro v. City of Fort WayneIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
- Wright v. WrightIndiana Court of Appeals · 1984
- Schreiber v. RickertIndiana Court of Appeals · 1943
- Gilbert v. LuskIndiana Court of Appeals · 1952
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hartley v. HartleyIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
- Irvine v. IrvineIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
- B-Dry Owners Ass'n v. B-Dry System, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1994
- Granger v. GrangerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
- Harlan v. HarlanIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.