Randall v. Songer
Illinois Supreme Court
This cause was heard before Harlan, Judge, at March term, 1851, of the Clay Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtTreat, C. J.
This was a bill in chancery to foreclose a mortgage. A summons was returned not served. An affidavit of the non-residence of the mortgagor appears in the record; and the decree of foreclosure states, that “it appears to the satisfaction of the court, that due notice has been given by publication, of the pendency of this suit.” There is nothing else in the record to show that the defendant was before the court. This is not sufficient to support the decree. In order to sustain a decree by default, it should affirmatively appear that the defendant has been regularly brought into court. A…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Heatherly v. HadleyOregon Supreme Court · 1869
- Law v. GrommesIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
- Platt v. StewartMichigan Supreme Court · 1862
- Reddick v. President of State BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1862
- Guaranty Trust & Safe Deposit Co. v. Buddington, Wilson & Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1891
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.