Legal Opinion

Baker v. Hunt

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1828PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Motion that clerk pay over to plaintiff money received by him of the defendant. The defendant in this-cause, without obtaining a rule for that purpose, paid to the clerk of this court, at Utica, $1481, in satisfaction of the plaintiff’s demand. The clerk received the defendant’s check for the amount, but declined giving a receipt for the same, until farther advised.

Read the full summary

Motion that clerk pay over to plaintiff money received by him of the defendant. The defendant in this-cause, without obtaining a rule for that purpose, paid to the clerk of this court, at Utica, $1481, in satisfaction of the plaintiff’s demand. The clerk received the defendant’s check for the amount, but declined giving a receipt for the same, until farther advised. In the course of a day or two, he returned the draft to the defendant, informing him that he was not authorized to receive the money, without a rule of court for that purpose. And a motion was now made by the attorney for the…

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Savage, Ch. J.

The motion is denied, with costs. The clerk had no right to receive the money, without a rule of court, and acted correctly in returning it to the defendant. (See 2 T. R. 62; 1 Sell. Prac. 18, 277, 8, 9; 1 Tidd, 566.)

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Davidson v. LampreySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1871
  2. Levan v. SternfeldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1892
  3. Brown v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1876
  4. Wilson v. DoranNew York Supreme Court · 1886

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API