Legal Opinion

State v. Hull

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 5, 1989No. Nos. 88-1894 to 88-1897PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The state contends in these appeals that upon convictions for four separate crimes calling statutorily for fifteen years maximum sentences, the trial court was required to run the sentences consecutively because of the guideline recommendation, notwithstanding Section 721.16(1), Florida Statutes (1987). Citing Branam v. State, 540 So.2d 158 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989), we disagree. When the recommended guideline sentence exceeds the statutory maximum, the statute for the particular crime controls. See State v. Thomas, 528 So.2d 1274 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988). We recognize the conflict and decline to follow…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. ThomasDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  2. Branam v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bruce v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API