Legal Opinion
In re Ed. W. Wright Lumber Co.
District Court, W.D. Arkansas
Decided April 30, 1902PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Intervention of A. E. Alphin for $1,945 as a preferred claim.
1Opinion of the Court
ROGERS, District Judge.
Prior to November 13, 1901, Ed. "W. Wright, doing business under the firm name of the Ed. W. Wright Lumber Company, was insolvent. The Eldorado Bank held a claim against him, in the form of overdrafts, for $1,945. Pie was also indebted to the claimant, A. L. Alphin (who was a stockholder and director in said bank), in the sum of $940, which had been past due for several months. • The Eldorado Bank, through counsel, was vigorously pressing its claim for collection and threatening suit. Ed. W. Wright himself was in ill health, and his father had come to his rescue in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Pirie v. Chicago Title & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Clark v. IselinSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Wilson v. City BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- National Bank v. WarrenSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
3Cited by5 opinions
- Coder v. ArtsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
- McKnight v. ShadboltWashington Supreme Court · 1917
- In re Advance Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1924
- In re BeldingDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1902
- Macon Grocery Co. v. BeachDistrict Court, S.D. Georgia · 1907