Anderson v. Anderson Ex Rel. Anderson
North Dakota Supreme Court
1DissentMaring, Justice
[¶ 14] I respectfully dissent and would answer the certified question in the negative, concluding the parent who signed the minor driver’s application for an instructional permit in accordance with N.D.C.C. § 39-06-08 is not barred by N.D.C.C. § 39-06-09 from recovery for damages sustained by the par*141ent from the negligence of the minor driver in the operation of an automobile.
[¶ 15] The majority is correct insofar as it recognizes the interpretation of a statute is a question of law. See Rydberg v. Johnson, 1998 ND 160, ¶ 6, 583 N.W.2d 631. We construe statutes to ascertain the intent of the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hughes v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. CarlsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Singha v. North Dakota State Board of Medical ExaminersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Matter of Estate of OpatzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Dundee Mutual Insurance Co. v. BalvitschNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.