Legal Opinion · Dissent

Anderson v. Anderson Ex Rel. Anderson

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1999No. 980251Published

1DissentMaring, Justice

[¶ 14] I respectfully dissent and would answer the certified question in the negative, concluding the parent who signed the minor driver’s application for an instructional permit in accordance with N.D.C.C. § 39-06-08 is not barred by N.D.C.C. § 39-06-09 from recovery for damages sustained by the par*141ent from the negligence of the minor driver in the operation of an automobile.

[¶ 15] The majority is correct insofar as it recognizes the interpretation of a statute is a question of law. See Rydberg v. Johnson, 1998 ND 160, ¶ 6, 583 N.W.2d 631. We construe statutes to ascertain the intent of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Hughes v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  2. State v. CarlsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Singha v. North Dakota State Board of Medical ExaminersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Matter of Estate of OpatzNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Dundee Mutual Insurance Co. v. BalvitschNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API