Legal Opinion
Harris County Water Control & Improvement District No. 110 v. Texas Water Rights Commission
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided January 23, 1980No. 13008PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PHILLIPS, Chief Justice.
The question involved in this appeal is whether a municipal utility district may provide park and recreational facilities which include a community center, three swimming pools, four tennis courts, and a clubhouse under the provisions of Tex. Water Code § 54.201(b)(7).
Appellant, Harris County Water Control and Improvement District No. 110, is a municipal utility district created pursuant to the provisions of Ch. 54 of the Texas Water Code. On September 22, 1976, after the district had announced plans for the proposed recreational facilities, a resident of the district…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Shepherd v. San Jacinto Junior College DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1962
- Deason v. Orange County Water Control & Improvement No. OneTexas Supreme Court · 1952
- Beckendorff v. Harris-Galveston Coastal Subsidence DistrictCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
- Beckendorff v. Harris-Galveston Coastal Subsidence DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1978
- Parker v. San Jacinto County Water Control & Improvement District No. 1Texas Supreme Court · 1954
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- McMillan v. Northwest Harris County Municipal Utility District No. 24, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1999
- Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports1989
- Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports1981
- Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports1990
- Opinion No., Texas Attorney General Reports1990
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.