Legal Opinion

Hall v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 3, 1977No. 76-1726PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McNULTY, Acting Chief Judge.

The only issue meriting discussion is whether, for the purposes of the speedy trial rule, a trial commences when the prospective jurors have been sworn for examination of their qualifications to act as jurors for the week but are not seated for voir dire in the particular trial. The case of State v. May, 332 So.2d 146 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976), answered this question in the negative. We agree. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.191(a)(3).

In the instant case it appears that on the last day of the speedy trial period, the first *933day of the trial week, prospective jurors were sworn to examine…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. MayDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Stuart v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
  2. Moore v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
  3. Moore v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API