Calkins v. Seabury-Calkins Consol. Min. Co.
South Dakota Supreme Court
Appeal from circuit court, Lawrence county. Hon. Chas. M. Thomas, Judge. Action to recover for services alleged to have been performed by plaintiff for the defendant company. Plaintiff had judgment, defendant appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtKellam, J.
This action was by respondent, as plaintiff, to recover for services alleged to have been performed by him for the defendant company, as its superintendent, during the years 1890 and 1891, the number of days in each month being particularly stated, at five dollars per day, which, it was alleged, was a reasonable compensation, and which amount the defendant promised to pay. The answer denied ‘that the plaintiff was the superintendent of this defendant, or did or performed any work or labor for this defendant, since the 19th day of September, 1891. It admits that prior to the 19th day of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Marston v. . SwettNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
- McNutt v. McNuttIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
- Stillwell v. HammSupreme Court of Missouri · 1888
- Bouck v. EnosWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
- Moore v. KendallWisconsin Supreme Court · 1849
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Kuntz v. StelmachukNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
- Pease v. MagillNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1908
- Johnson v. GilmoreSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
- Fidelity Savings & Loan Ass'n v. ReeseSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1919
- Comeau v. HurleySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.