Legal Opinion

Murphy v. New York Bowery Fire Insurance

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 14, 1895PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the Phelps Circuit Court. — Hon. C. C. Bland, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtBond, J.

Plaintiff recovered judgment for the amount of a policy of insurance on his flouring mill and machinery issued by defendant, from which this appeal is taken.

On the trial it was conceded that the loss was total; that it occurred on the fifteenth of March, 1893, and that due notice and proofs of loss were forwarded to •the defendant. This suit was begun July 28, 1894. About April, 1894, plaintiff tendered defendant verified plans of the property destroyed, which were refused as having been offered too late. Plaintiff carried concurrent insurance on .the property, secured through the *497same agent…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Havens v. Germania Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1894
  2. Wallace v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1832
  3. Burnham, Hanna, Munger & Co v. Greenwich InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1894

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McCollum v. Liverpool, London & Globe InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1896
  2. McCollum v. Hartford Fire InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1896
  3. Marshal v. American Guarantee Mutual Fire InsuranceMissouri Court of Appeals · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API