Kountz Bros. v. Consolidated Ice Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 10, April T., 1905, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. No. 2, Allegheny Co., April T., 1901, No. 358, on verdict for defendant in case of Kountz Brothers Company v. Consolidated Ice Company, owner, and Petter W. Herrington et al. Scire facias sur mechanic’s lien. Before- Rodgers, J. The opinion of the Superior Court states the facts of the case. Verdict and judgment for defendant. Plaintiff appealed.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 10, April T., 1905, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. No. 2, Allegheny Co., April T., 1901, No. 358, on verdict for defendant in case of Kountz Brothers Company v. Consolidated Ice Company, owner, and Petter W. Herrington et al. Scire facias sur mechanic’s lien. Before- Rodgers, J. The opinion of the Superior Court states the facts of the case. Verdict and judgment for defendant. Plaintiff appealed. Errors assigned were (1-4) answers to points quoted in the opinion of the Superior Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Beaver, J.,
The plaintiff, which furnished brick for the foundations for an engine in the erection of an ice manufacturing plant, under a contract with the principal contractor, was undoubtedly entitled to its hen, if the materials furnished by it were necessary to the erection of a primary or principal or essential part of said building: Parrish’s Appeal, 83 Pa. 111; Dimmick v. Cook, 115 Pa. 573; Owen v. Johnson, 174 Pa. 99. See also Schenck v. Uber & Tees, 81 Pa. 31, the case upon which the court below ruled this case; Duff v. Hoffman, 63 Pa. 191; Harlan v. Rand, 27 Pa. 511;…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Harlan v. RandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1856
- Owen v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
- Parrish & Hazard's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1877
- Singerly v. DoerrSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1869
- Dimmick v. Cook Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1887
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.