Arteck Services, Inc. v. Landis Construction Co.

Strahan v. Landis Construction Co., Inc., 499 So.2d 417 (La.App. 4 Cir.1986), cert, granted 500 So.2d 414, is in point but superseded by the supreme court’s writ grant. As demonstrated by Judge Barry in his dissent in Strahan, however, and as suggested by the writ grant, Strahan was wrongly decided. The present case can only be correctly decided by disagreeing with Strahan and overruling Miller v. Housing Authority of N.O., 175 So.2d 326 (La.App. 4 Cir.1965), rev’d in part 249 La. *609623, 190 So.2d 75 (1966), upon which Stra-han relied. This case should be referred to the court en banc to…