Legal Opinion
State v. Holman
Bay County Court
Decided May 29, 1991No. Case Nos. 91-972-MMO and 91-971-MMAPublished
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
THOMAS F. WELCH, County Judge.
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS
In each of the above-styled companion cases, the Defendant has filed *140a Motion to Dismiss. Neither Motion is sworn to by the Defendant, and it is not contended by either Defendant that the facts are undisputed. Instead, each Defendant argues that the State’s facts, as set forth in the depositions of the arresting officers, do not constitute the crimes charged. For the reasons set forth more fully below, each Motion to Dismiss is denied.
STATE v DERAL GENE HOLMAN
CASE NO. 91-972-MMO
Deral Holman is…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- State v. UptonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Wilkerson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990
- Johnson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Rumph v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
- Rosenberg v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.