Legal Opinion

In re Ellis

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided August 25, 2011No. Docket Nos. 301884 and 301887PublishedCited by 95 opinions

1Per curiam

In these consolidated appeals, respondents appeal as of right the trial court’s order terminating their parental rights to A. Ellis. We affirm.

Respondents are the child’s parents. When A. Ellis was less than two months of age, Children’s Protective Services (CPS) received a complaint that the child had been brought to the hospital with, to understate the situation, injuries from physical abuse. In fact, skull x-rays and skeletal surveys revealed that the child had swelling and multiple skull fractures on the upper-rear right side of his head. He had internal bleeding inside the skull, over…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re Trejo MinorsMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  2. In re VanDalenMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. In Re MillerMichigan Supreme Court · 1989
  4. In Re SoursMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
  5. People v. JamisonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011

3Cited by95 opinions

  1. In re SchadlerMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. In re LaFrance MinorsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. In re BrownMichigan Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. In re MartinMichigan Court of Appeals · 2016
  5. In re BeersMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018

90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API