In Re Cashmere State Bank
Washington Supreme Court
1Dissent
I grant, solus arguendo, that the power to appoint receivers is inherent in courts of equity, and that the legislature can not divest the courts of that prerogative. However, equity courts at the common law, and at the time of the adoption of our state constitution, did not have, and at the present time in the absence of statutory authority therefor, they do not have, the power to authorize and direct chancery receivers to borrow money for any purposes other than that of preservation of the property of the insolvent or the continuance of the insolvent's business. In the case at bar, the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Craver v. GreerTexas Supreme Court · 1915
- Lockport Felt Co. v. United Box Board & Paper Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1908
- Rhode Island Hospital Trust Co. v. S. H. Greene & Sons Corp.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1929