Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Nussenzweig v. diCorcia

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 20, 2007Published

1Concurrence

Tom, J.P, and Malone, J., concur in a separate memorandum by Tom, J.P, as follows:

This controversy over a photograph of plaintiff Erno Nussenzweig taken by defendant Philip-Lorca

diCorcia and exhibited and sold by defendant Pace/MacGill, Inc. (collectively, defendants) raises two issues: whether the use of an individual’s likeness in a work of art is subject to an action under New York’s privacy statute (Civil Rights Law §§ 50, 51) and whether the statute of limitations governing such an action runs from the date of the first unauthorized use, as this Court has held (Costanza v Seinfeld, 279…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Shelley v. KraemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Time, Inc. v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Riley v. National Federation of Blind of North Carolina, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Rescue Army v. Municipal Court of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. Zelman v. Simmons-HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API