Legal Opinion

Smith v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided May 23, 1988No. 86-1373PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TERRY, Associate Judge:

Appellant was convicted of distributing heroin, in violation of D.C.Code § 33-541(a)(l) (1987 Supp.). During its deliberations the jury sent the trial court two notes that revealed the number of jurors who favored conviction. After receiving the second of these notes, which disclosed that eleven jurors were in favor of conviction and one was in favor of acquittal, the trial court gave a Winters anti-deadlock instruction.1 Appellant contends that under these circumstances the Winters instruction was coercive. We agree and reverse.

*824I

The government’s evidence showed that…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Rogers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. United States v. Cecil RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  3. Winters v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1974
  4. United States v. Burl A. Sawyers, Vincent J. Johnkoski, Bonn Brown, Alfred W. SchroathCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1970
  5. United States v. Tyrone B. Diggs, United States of America v. Garrett J. Keys, United States of America v. Percy Floyd, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Sumnar Robert Brewster v. Gary HetzelCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
  2. Graham v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  3. State v. LaneyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. Harris v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Downing v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API