Rice v. Garnhart
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLyon, J.
Thi s action is similar to another between the same parties decided at the present term, except that the question of the validity of the patent is not here involved. * The suit was brought to recover the first installment, due October 1, 1872, on the agreement of August 8, 1872, and for certain services and expenses. The only ground assigned for reversing the judgment is, that the defendant’s agreement to pay the installment sought to be recovered, is nudum paclum. This position was disposed of in the other case adversely to the defendant, and further discussion of it here is entirely…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Morse v. Buffalo Fire & Marine InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1872
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ossowski v. WiesnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898