Legal Opinion
J. Howard Arnold, Debtor in Possession v. Frances K. Arnold
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 5, 1966No. 20107_1PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Per curiam
On a former appeal, this court upheld the order of the referee in bankruptcy setting aside his order confirming the arrangement which the debtor, Arnold, had proposed under Chapter XI of the Bankruptcy Act. (326 F.2d 960).
The referee grounded his ruling upon a finding that the arrangement was tainted by fraud. This court, declaring that there was “ample evidence” to support that conclusion, affirmed. (326 F.2d 960 at 962).
Thereafter, Arnold, pursuant to leave granted by the referee “to propose * * * alterations or modifications of the arrangement for the purpose of correcting the fraud” [11…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Tinkoff v. GoldCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1946
- J. Howard Arnold v. Frances K. ArnoldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
3Cited by3 opinions
- Seattle First National Bank v. Hilltop RealtyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
- J. Howard Arnold v. Frances K. ArnoldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
- Seattle First National Bank, as of the Estate of Laurence P. Smith v. Hilltop Realty, Hilltop Realty v. Seattle First National Bank, as of the Estate of Laurence P. Smith,et Al.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1967