Legal Opinion

Suder v. Whiteford, Taylor & Preston, LLP

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 9, 2010No. 15, September Term, 2009PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ADKINS, Judge.

The trial-within-a-trial doctrine is unique to legal malpractice cases. The doctrine provides a mechanism we do not see elsewhere for a tribunal to resolve a proximate cause query. When the doctrine is applicable, the litigants reconstruct the underlying action, absent the supposed breach of duty. The tribunal must not only determine how the parties would have proceeded had there been no breach, but must also assume the role of the earlier adjudicator in order to ascertain the probable outcome of the action. Simply put, the court must try a case within a case.

We have previously…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Migra v. Warren City School District Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Frederick Road Ltd. Partnership v. SturmCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  3. Haas v. Lockheed Martin Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  4. Kent County Board of Education v. BilbroughCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  5. Central Cab Co. v. ClarkeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Gerber Products Company v. Mitchell Williams Selig GatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2022
  2. Burr v. Maryland State Retirement & Pension SystemCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  3. Coomes v. MoranDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2024
  4. Craig A. Reichel v. Wendland Utz, LTDSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2024
  5. Jennings v. Whiteford, Taylor & Preston LLPDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2025

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API