Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Pardee

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 15, 1933PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

In a proceeding brought under section 231-a of the Surrogate’s Court Act to fix the amount of the compensation of an attorney for services rendered to an estate or to its executor or administrator, there is no absolute right to a jury trial under sections 67 and 68 of the Surrogate’s Act because the attorney has no constitutional right to the trial of the issue by a jury, as no right of action for such compensation existed in favor of the attorney against the executor or administrator as such. The present proceeding is not akin to an action to recover the value of petitioner’s services…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re the Estate of PardeeNew York Surrogate's Court · 1930

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of LearyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1940
  2. In re the Estate of DavisNew York Surrogate's Court · 1957
  3. In re the Estate of PopekNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935
  4. In re the Estate of LudlamNew York Surrogate's Court · 1957
  5. In re the Estate of PepiNew York Surrogate's Court · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API