Legal Opinion

Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Buckner

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 13, 1925No. 2997PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The instructions given by the court to the jury are expressed in proper terms of law, and no fault can be found in them. This conclusion eliminates from the consideration of the case many of the questions sought to be raised by the assignments of error.

The main question presented in the appeal is that of whether or not the mental disturbance caused to the appellee by the appellant, such as the evidence shows, can be held to be an element of the damages resulting from the breach of contract, for which a recovery is allowable under the law. According to the evidence the appellee's husband…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rowell v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1889
  2. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. EdmondsonTexas Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. GiffinTexas Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Johnson v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1896
  5. Morrison v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1900

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. HouseCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API