Legal Opinion

Natare Corp. v. D.S.I., Duraplastec Systems, Inc.

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 2006No. 49S05-0512-CV-637Published

1Opinion of the Court

SULLIVAN, Justice.

Natare Corporation filed this lawsuit, contending that an arbitrator had wrongly denied it attorney fees to which it was entitled. Indiana law specifies limited bases upon which an arbitrator's award may be challenged in a trial court. We agree with the trial court that neither of the bases advanced by Natare is available to it here: the arbitrator did not exceed his authority in denying Natare attorney fees, nor did he make his decision to deny Na-tare attorney fees before the attorney fee issue was presented to him.

Background

Appellant Natare Corporation and Ap-pellees…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. MPACT Construction Group, LLC v. Superior Concrete Constructors, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 2004
  2. PSI Energy, Inc. v. Amax, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1994
  3. School City of East Chicago v. East Chicago Federation of Teachers, Local Number 511Indiana Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Natare Corp. v. DSI DURAPLASTIC SYSTEMS, INC.Indiana Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Natare Corp. v. D.S.I., Duraplastec Systems, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API