Legal Opinion
Department of Human Services v. K. L.
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided July 8, 2015No. 140858J; Petition Numbers 140858J01, 140858J02; A158194PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, P. J.
Father and mother appeal a judgment in which the juvenile court asserted jurisdiction over their 16-year-old son. The substance of parents’ appeal is that the juvenile court erred by entering the jurisdictional judgment because the Department of Human Services (DHS) had not properly served parents with summons, as DHS was required to do for the juvenile court to enter a jurisdictional judgment. DHS responds that parents were properly served under ORS 419B.823, positing that service of summons is adequate under that statute if it meets the requirements of the Due Process Clause of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Rio Properties, Inc. v. Rio International Interlink, Rio Properties, Inc. v. Rio International InterlinkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Jones v. FlowersSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Walker v. City of HutchinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Greene v. LindseySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. ChapmanOregon Supreme Court · 2020
- Department of Human Services v. K. G. A. B.Deschutes County Circuit Court, Oregon · 2016
- State v. T. L. E.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2026