Legal Opinion

Andrizinsky v. Phillips

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided June 5, 1923PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWatson, C. J.

This case is here on exceptions from the rulings of the Fair Haven Municipal Court. The defendant seasonably objected to the drawing of a jury from the jury list on file, on the ground that the judge did not prepare such list and place the same on file until after February 10, 1922, the time limited by the terms of section 1651 of the General Laws. The objection was overruled and exception saved. Thereupon a jury was drawn from said list and the ease came on for trial. Before the jury was sworn, the same question was again saved by exception to proceeding with the trial.

G. L. 1651 provides…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Colt v. EvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1837
  2. Warner v. MowerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1839
  3. Holland v. OsgoodSupreme Court of Vermont · 1836

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re MullesteinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1987
  2. Spaulding & Kimball Co. v. Aetna Chemical Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1924
  3. State v. Kimberly LoveSupreme Court of Vermont · 2017
  4. State v. Kimberly LoveSupreme Court of Vermont · 2017
  5. State v. Kimberly LoveVermont Superior Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API