Legal Opinion

Perez v. Marine Transport Lines, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Louisiana

Decided March 14, 1958No. 5164PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

J. SKELLY WRIGHT, District Judge.

The question presented by this case is the status of the plaintiff at the time of his injury. Specifically, was the injury covered by the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act 1 or by the Jones Act 2 and the general maritime law?

Perez was by occupation a seaman and a member of the National Maritime Union. He, along with others, was sent from the hiring hall of the Union to the USNS Mission Loretto, 3 not to serve as' regular members of the crew of that vessel, but to give her tanks one final cleaning prior to inspection by U. S. Navy officials…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Seas Shipping Co. v. SierackiSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. South Chicago Coal & Dock Co. v. BassettSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Swanson v. Marra Brothers, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Senko v. LaCrosse Dredging Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Desper v. Starved Rock Ferry Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Baker v. Pacific Far East Lines, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1978
  2. Bellomy v. Union Concrete Pipe Co.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 1969
  3. Stallworth v. McFarlandDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1972
  4. Arundel Corp. v. JasperCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1959
  5. Mietla v. WARNER COMPANYDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API