Legal Opinion
Saving v. State
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 6, 1993PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In a claim to recover damages for personal injuries, the claimant appeals from an order of the Court of Claims (Corbett, J.), entered October 3, 1991, which denied his application pursuant to Court of Claims Act § 10 (6) for leave to serve a late notice of claim.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Court of Claims Act § 10 (6) permits the late filing of a claim, in the court’s discretion, based on certain enumerated factors. One of the factors to be considered is whether the *255claim has the appearance of merit, as it would be futile to permit a defective claim to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Prusack v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Rosenhack v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1982
- Lieberman v. Washington Square Hotel Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
- Jerrett v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
3Cited by15 opinions
- Qing Liu v. City UniversityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Martinez v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Ortiz v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Edens v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Brewer v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1998
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.