Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Wiesmann v. Kemen

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 1884PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Kenosha County. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion. The defendants appealed from a judgment reversing and declaring void the sale of the school-house.

1Opinion of the CourtTatloe, J.

In this case a writ of certiorari was issued out of the circuit court of Kenosha county upon the petition of the respondent, directed to the appellants, as district clerk and district treasurer of joint school district No. 1 of the towns of Brighton and Paris, in said county of Kenosha. The object of the proceeding is set out fully in the petition for the writ, and is to set aside a sale of the school-house and fixtures alleged to be owned by said district, and which, it is alleged, the said Kemen and Thom had unlawfully, and without authority, wrongfully and fraudulently sold to one Joseph…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Church v. Supervisors of AlleganyNew York Supreme Court · 1836
  2. People ex rel. Moore v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1848
  3. Nevil v. CliffordWisconsin Supreme Court · 1882
  4. People ex rel. Dickinson v. Board of SupervisorsNew York Supreme Court · 1864
  5. State ex rel. Town of Manitowoo v. County Clerk of Manitowoo CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Independent Publishing Co. v. American Press Ass'nSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  2. Pine Bluff Water & Light Co. v. City of Pine BluffSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1896
  3. In re the Application of EvingsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1891
  4. State ex rel. Peart v. Wisconsin Highway CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API