Bogert v. State

Brian Bogert appeals portions of a restitution order imposed by the trial court after he entered pleas of guilty as charged to dealing in stolen property1 and grand theft2 pursuant to a plea agreement. He contends on appeal that the restitution order was erroneous because there is no nexus between the amount of restitution ordered and his criminal activity. Bogert also contends that the trial court did not establish that he had the ability to pay $100 per month restitution. We affirm.

Bogert confessed to receiving and pawning stolen property. He admitted buying electronic equipment and…