Legal Opinion
Acme Propane, Inc. v. Tenexco, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided August 18, 1987No. 86 C 9119PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ASPEN, District Judge:
Plaintiffs Frank S. Kasper, Jerome J. Kasper and Acme Propane, Inc. (referred to collectively as “Acme”) filed this action seeking damages for alleged securities fraud. Defendants Tenexco, Inc., Richard S. Incandela, Energy Funding Company, Inc. (“Energy”) and Ronald S. Nietupski filed a motion to dismiss Acme’s amended complaint under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 9(b). Defendants G.A.P. Enterprises (“GAP”) and Lenard Pearson also moved to dismiss and adopted the other defendants’ filings. For the following reasons, we agree that the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Santa Fe Industries, Inc. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Teamsters Local 282 Pension Trust Fund v. Anthony G. AngelosCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,713 Acme Propane, Inc., Frank S. Kasper, and Jerome J. Kasper, Plaintiffs v. Tenexco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988