Legal Opinion

Bryant v. Glazier Supermarkets, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 4, 2003PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY DEL SOLE, P.J.:

¶ 1 This is an appeal from a judgment entered for $100,000 plus delay damages following a jury verdict in favor of Appel-lees and against Appellant-supermarket. Appellees, husband and wife, brought an action seeking to recovery for injury sustained after Appellee-wife was struck on her foot by canned goods which were part of a display but fell. There was testimony offered at trial that Appellee-wife suffered a chronic diabetic foot abscess as a result of the incident which, despite daily intravenous treatments, developed into gangrene and resulted in the amputation…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ButlerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Commonwealth v. AlsopSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Everett Cash Mutual Insurance v. T.H.E. InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. Commonwealth v. OverbySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. Commonwealth v. NixonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. TiradoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Roth Cash Register Co. v. Micro Systems, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  3. Commonwealth v. DouglasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Bryant v. Glazier Supermarkets, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. Chea, D. v. Estate of May, B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API