Legal Opinion

Pendygraft v. Ford Motor Co.

Kentucky Supreme Court

Decided August 21, 2008No. 2007-SC-000658-WCPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

An Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) included profit-sharing bonuses in the claimant’s pre- and post-injury average weekly wage and, on that basis, found her to be ineligible for a double income benefit under KRS 342.730(l)(c)2. The Workers’ Compensation Board affirmed. The claimant appeals a decision by the Court of Appeals to reverse and remand with directions to exclude the bonuses.

We affirm but for different reasons. To the extent that an employee works for profit-sharing in lieu of wages, the employee’s actual hourly wage is not fixed or cannot be determined. The average…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Osborne v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1968
  2. Fawbush v. GwinnKentucky Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Ball v. Big Elk Creek Coal Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Whittaker v. RobinsonKentucky Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Marsh v. Mercer TransportationKentucky Supreme Court · 2002

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. General Motors v. Brandi WoodsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API