Legal Opinion

Grace v. Grace

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 31, 1964No. F-30PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

162 So.2d 314 (1964)

Donald (Don) W. GRACE, Appellant,

v.

Ruth F. GRACE, Appellee.

No. F-30.

District Court of Appeal of Florida. First District.

March 31, 1964.

Kurz, Toole, Maness & Martin, Jacksonville, for appellant.

Walter G. Arnold, Jacksonville, for appellee.

MASON, Associate Judge.

Pursuant to Rule 4.2, F.A.R., 31 F.S.A., appellant has taken an interlocutory appeal from an order entered by the chancellor below awarding temporary alimony and other relief pendente lite.

After appellant filed his brief herein the appellee moved to strike that portion of the record below designated as "Testimony and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Harlan v. HarlanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  2. Klein v. KleinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960
  3. Arendall v. ArendallSupreme Court of Florida · 1911
  4. Gaylord v. GaylordSupreme Court of Florida · 1950
  5. Holly v. HollySupreme Court of Florida · 1921

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Wolfson v. WolfsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  2. Weasel v. WeaselDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  3. Bowie v. NicholsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Kreuz v. KreuzDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Saunders v. SaundersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API