Legal Opinion
Kyocera Corporation, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant v. Prudential-Bache Trade Services, Inc., Dba Prudential-Bache Trade Corporation Prudential Capital & Investment Services, Inc. Lapine Technology Corporation Lapine Holding Co., Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Appellees. Lapine Technology Corporation v. Kyocera Corporation, Lapine Technology Corporation, Plaintiff-Counter-Claim-Defendant-Appellee. v. Kyocera Corporation, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Plaintiff-Appellant v. Prudential-Bache Trade Services, Inc., Dba Prudential-Bache Trade Corporation Prudential Capital & Investment Services, Inc., Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Appellees
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 29, 2003No. 01-16528PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
341 F.3d 987
KYOCERA CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant,
v.
PRUDENTIAL-BACHE TRADE SERVICES, INC., dba Prudential-Bache Trade Corporation; Prudential Capital & Investment Services, Inc.; Lapine Technology Corporation; Lapine Holding Co., Defendants-Counter-Claimants-Appellees.
LaPine Technology Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Kyocera Corporation, Defendant-Appellant.
LaPine Technology Corporation, Plaintiff-Counter-Claim-defendant-Appellee.
v.
Kyocera Corporation, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Prudential-Bache Trade Services, Inc., dba Prudential-Bache Trade…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Schoeduve Corp. v. Lucent TechnologiesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006